🔗 Share this article

Thhese times present a quite unique situation: the first-ever US march of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their qualifications and attributes, but they all have the same mission – to prevent an Israeli breach, or even demolition, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. After the conflict concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's representatives on the territory. Just recently saw the presence of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few days it launched a set of strikes in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military soldiers – leading, based on accounts, in scores of local injuries. Several officials urged a resumption of the war, and the Israeli parliament passed a initial measure to incorporate the West Bank. The American response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the American government seems more concentrated on upholding the existing, unstable phase of the truce than on progressing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Regarding that, it seems the United States may have goals but no tangible strategies.

At present, it remains unclear when the suggested multinational oversight committee will effectively assume control, and the similar goes for the proposed security force – or even the identity of its soldiers. On Tuesday, Vance declared the United States would not force the membership of the international force on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's government continues to refuse various proposals – as it did with the Turkish offer recently – what happens then? There is also the contrary point: who will determine whether the units favoured by the Israelis are even interested in the task?

The question of the duration it will take to demilitarize the militant group is similarly vague. “The aim in the government is that the global peacekeeping unit is will now take the lead in disarming Hamas,” stated the official this week. “It’s going to take a while.” The former president only emphasized the uncertainty, saying in an discussion on Sunday that there is no “fixed” deadline for the group to lay down arms. So, in theory, the unidentified elements of this not yet established global contingent could arrive in Gaza while the organization's fighters still hold power. Are they confronting a leadership or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the concerns arising. Others might question what the outcome will be for average civilians as things stand, with Hamas persisting to focus on its own adversaries and critics.

Latest events have once again underscored the blind spots of local journalism on both sides of the Gaza boundary. Every publication attempts to scrutinize every possible aspect of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, in general, the reality that the organization has been stalling the repatriation of the remains of slain Israeli hostages has dominated the coverage.

By contrast, reporting of civilian fatalities in Gaza stemming from Israeli attacks has garnered scant focus – if any. Consider the Israeli counter actions after a recent Rafah event, in which two military personnel were killed. While local sources stated dozens of fatalities, Israeli news pundits questioned the “moderate answer,” which focused on just infrastructure.

That is nothing new. During the past weekend, Gaza’s information bureau charged Israeli forces of infringing the truce with the group multiple times after the agreement was implemented, resulting in the loss of 38 individuals and injuring another 143. The allegation seemed insignificant to most Israeli media outlets – it was merely ignored. That included reports that eleven members of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s rescue organization reported the individuals had been trying to go back to their dwelling in the a Gaza City area of Gaza City when the bus they were in was targeted for allegedly crossing the “yellow line” that marks territories under Israeli military authority. That yellow line is invisible to the naked eye and appears only on plans and in official records – often not available to everyday individuals in the territory.

Yet this occurrence barely received a mention in Israeli news outlets. One source mentioned it in passing on its online platform, referencing an Israeli military official who stated that after a questionable car was spotted, troops shot alerting fire towards it, “but the transport continued to move toward the troops in a manner that caused an immediate threat to them. The troops engaged to neutralize the threat, in line with the ceasefire.” Zero injuries were reported.

Amid such framing, it is understandable a lot of Israeli citizens think Hamas alone is to at fault for infringing the peace. That view threatens prompting calls for a tougher approach in Gaza.

At some point – maybe sooner than expected – it will no longer be enough for all the president’s men to act as kindergarten teachers, advising Israel what to refrain from. They will {have to|need