🔗 Share this article

According to a new examination, dozens of personnel with experience in the petroleum field have been appointed within the current leadership, featuring more than 40 who formerly served directly for oil companies.

Context of the Study

The report investigated the backgrounds of candidates and officials working in the executive branch and eight national offices overseeing energy matters. Those cover key bodies like the EPA, the Department of the Interior, and the energy office.

Wider Policy Environment

The analysis comes during persistent efforts to dismantle environmental policies and alternative energy supports. For instance, new acts have unlocked large areas of government property for drilling and eliminated support for clean energy.

With the firehose of terrible things that have transpired on the climate front... it’s vital to educate the citizens that these aren’t just actions from the vague, huge thing that is the administration writ large, commented one analyst engaged in the study. They are frequently specific individuals originating from specific wealthy groups that are carrying out this damaging anti-regulatory agenda.

Key Discoveries

Authors found 111 employees whom they classified as energy sector veterans and renewable energy opponents. This covers 43 people who were previously employed by gas companies. Among them are high-profile top executives including the energy secretary, who previously acted as chief executive of a fracking firm.

The group also contains less prominent White House members. For example, the office overseeing energy efficiency is managed by a former gas manager. Likewise, a high-level regulatory consultant in the administration has held top-level roles at major petroleum firms.

Other Connections

A further 12 officials have links to energy-financed conservative thinktanks. These cover previous employees and researchers of entities that have strongly opposed alternative sources and advocated the use of fossil fuels.

A total of 29 additional staff are former business executives from polluting industries whose business interests are intimately linked to fossil fuels. Other personnel have connections with utility firms that market fossil fuels or elected leaders who have supported pro-oil policies.

Departmental Emphasis

Investigators found that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior alone have connections to fossil fuel energy, rendering it the most compromised national body. This encompasses the secretary of the office, who has repeatedly taken oil funding and served as a bridge between fossil fuel industry donors and the government.

Political Finance

Fossil fuel donors contributed sizable resources to the election initiative and inauguration. Since entering the White House, the leadership has not only established pro-fossil fuel rules but also created tax breaks and exemptions that benefit the field.

Experience Issues

Besides oil-tied candidates, the researchers noted a number of government leaders who were nominated to key jobs with little or no subject matter experience.

Those people may not be tied to the energy sector so closely, but their inexperience is concerning, said one co-author. It is logical to think they will be pushovers, or easy marks, for the energy sector’s objectives.

For example, the nominee to lead the EPA’s division of chief legal officer has limited litigation background, having not once tried a legal matter to verdict, not taken a deposition, and nor filed a court petition.

During another example, a administration advisor working on regulatory issues came to the position after working in roles unrelated to the industry, with no obvious relevant field or administrative background.

Administration Reaction

One representative for the administration dismissed the analysis, saying that the government’s appointees are highly qualified to execute on the public’s directive to increase domestic energy development.

Previous and Current Backdrop

This leadership oversaw a significant series of deregulatory measures during its initial term. In its second term, prepared with rightwing blueprints, it has initiated a far wider and stricter rollback on climate rules and renewable energy.

There is no embarrassment, said a analyst. The administration is willing and willing to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing assistance for the energy business, resource sector, the coal sector.